Home / Compare

Filtrate vs Cloudinary

One focused API vs a full digital asset management suite

Common objection:

"Cloudinary has a full platform — why choose Filtrate?"

Cloudinary charges $89+/mo and moderation is an add-on. Filtrate covers all three operations — EXIF strip, optimization, and AI moderation — at the same price with no upsell. If you just need optimization, maybe Cloudinary fits. If you need compliance-ready media with moderation built in, Filtrate wins on price and simplicity.

Feature comparison

Feature Filtrate Cloudinary
EXIF / GPS metadata strip Partial — transformation pipeline only
WebP / AVIF optimization Yes — automatic format selection
AI content moderation (GPT-4o) Add-on (AI Add-on) — not core
Banned-logo detection No — not offered
Fraud / AI-generated image detection No — not offered
GPS coordinate stripping Requires transformation pipeline config
R2/CDN storage included Yes — Cloudinary CDN
Sub-100ms p95 latency Variable — depends on plan tier and region
No credit expiration Credits-based; some plans expire
Per-image flat pricing Credit bundles; overage risk at scale
Developer sandbox (no card) Free tier: 25k transforms/mo
Setup in minutes (single call) Full config; SDK setup; CDN integration

Pricing comparison

You pay
Cloudinary
~$89/mo
Plus plan minimum, billed annually
Limited coverage
Best value
Filtrate
$0.002 / image
No monthly minimum
EXIF metadata strip
WebP optimization
AI content moderation
All 3 operations included

Cost at 100K images / month

Filtrate
$200/mo
100K images × $0.002
All 3 operations
Cloudinary
$224+/mo
$89/mo min (Advanced, annual) + AI Add-on ($135/mo est. at 100K images)
Source: cloudinary.com/pricing
Filtrate is 2–3× cheaper at 100K/mo

Code diff: 3 steps vs 1

Cloudinary — 3 steps required

1
Upload to Cloudinary cloudinary.uploader.upload_stream(...)
2
Enable AI Add-on Subscribe, configure detection models, add moderation chain
3
Strip EXIF via transformation fl_preserve_meta: false, f_auto
vs

Filtrate — 1 POST

fetch('https://api.filtrate.polsia.app/v1/process', {
  method: 'POST',
  headers: { 'X-API-Key': 'flt_live_…' },
  body: new FormData().append('image', file),
});
EXIF strip + WebP + AI moderation — all done.

When to pick Filtrate

  • You need EXIF + moderation + WebP in a single call without stitching three services together
  • You want transparent per-image pricing with no monthly minimum
  • You are a developer building a compliance flow and need it live today, not in a sprint
  • You are processing user-generated images on an e-commerce marketplace and need GDPR-safe media
  • You want GPT-4o-mini moderation included, not as an add-on
Start free

When Cloudinary makes sense

  • You already run Cloudinary for asset management and just need moderation bolted on
  • You need advanced video processing, animated transformation pipelines, or granular asset versioning
  • Your team is larger and needs the full DAM UI for non-technical editors
  • You want a single vendor for CDN, image optimization, and basic content tagging in an established org
  • You want to use both: run Filtrate first for compliance (EXIF strip + moderation), then push to Cloudinary for delivery/transformation in your DAM
Visit Cloudinary →

One API. All three operations. No vendor lock-in.

Most tools do one thing well. Filtrate does everything compliance demands in a single call. No stitching together a CDN + moderation service + metadata stripper. One endpoint. One bill. One integration.

Try the API playground

Test against real images. See the verdict in 1–5 seconds. No account required — start with a $5 credit pack.

Calculate your savings →

Also compare: