Home / Compare

Filtrate vs Sightengine

Moderation-only API vs unified compliance pipeline

Common objection:

"Sightengine has dedicated moderation models — Filtrate can't match that."

Sightengine's models are solid, but moderation is only one part of the compliance checklist. For marketplaces, classifieds, and listing sites, you also need EXIF stripped and WebP compression. Sightengine does none of that. You'd need to stitch together: Sightengine for moderation + a CDN for EXIF + a separate optimizer. That's three vendors and three integrations. Filtrate handles all three for $0.002/image.

Feature comparison

Feature Filtrate Sightengine
Metadata strip (EXIF) No
Image optimization (WebP/AVIF) No
AI content moderation Yes — multi-model classification
Built-in storage/delivery No — classification only
Human review workflow No — build yourself
Developer-first API Raw REST — limited SDK, documented integration issues
No double-vendor risk Must pair with CDN/storage separately
Free sandbox Free tier with limits

Pricing comparison

You pay
Sightengine
$619/mo
Pro $99 + 260K overage ops × $0.002 (at 100K images × 3 models)
Limited coverage
Best value
Filtrate
$200/mo
100K images, all operations included
EXIF metadata strip
WebP optimization
AI content moderation
All 3 operations included

Cost at volume — Filtrate vs Sightengine

Volume Filtrate Sightengine
10K images/mo $20 10K × $0.002 $69 Starter $29 + 20K overage × $0.002 (3 models = 30K ops)
100K images/mo $200 100K × $0.002 $619 Pro $99 + 260K overage × $0.002 (3 models = 300K ops)
1M images/mo $2,000 1M × $0.002 $6,019+ Pro $99 + ~2.96M overage × $0.002 (3 models = 3M ops) — Enterprise pricing likely applies

* Source: sightengine.com/pricing · Retrieved 2026-06-05. Sightengine bills per operation; 3 moderation model groups (nudity, weapons, gore) = 3 ops/image. Overage rate $0.002/op on both Starter and Pro plans.

Integration effort

Filtrate
One POST. Everything done.
const result = await fetch('https://api.filtrate.polsia.app/v1/process', {
  method: 'POST',
  headers: { 'X-API-Key': 'flt_live_…' },
  body: new FormData().append('image', file),
});
// Returns: moderated image (EXIF stripped, WebP optimized, verdict included)
Single fetch, no SDK, no config file. Live in minutes.
Sightengine
SDK + config + CDN chain.
// Sightengine: one model group per request
const r1 = await fetch('https://api.sightengine.com/1.0/check.json', {
  method: 'POST',
  body: new FormData([
    ['media', imageFile],
    ['models', 'nudity-2.1,weapon,gore-2.0'],
    ['api_user', '{api_user}'],
    ['api_secret', '{api_secret}'],
  ]),
});
// EXIF strip? NOT AVAILABLE — need a separate tool
// WebP optimize? NOT AVAILABLE — need another tool
Multiple steps, vendor config, pipeline to wire up.

When to pick Filtrate

  • You need EXIF strip, optimization, and moderation in one call without three integrations
  • You want transparent per-image pricing with no per-model billing surprises
  • You need GDPR-safe media for a marketplace or e-commerce platform
  • You want GPT-4o-mini moderation included, not as an add-on
  • You need to get live today, not in a sprint
Start free

When Sightengine makes sense

  • You only need classification-only moderation with no image transformation or storage needs
  • You already have a separate CDN and metadata stripper and just want moderation
  • You need a specific model that Sightengine has and Filtrate does not
Visit Sightengine →

One API. All three operations. No vendor lock-in.

Most tools do one thing well. Filtrate does everything compliance demands in a single call. No stitching together a CDN + moderation service + metadata stripper. One endpoint. One bill. One integration.

Try the API playground

Test against real images. See the verdict in 1–5 seconds. No account required.

Calculate your savings →

Also compare: