Filtrate vs Sightengine
Moderation-only API vs unified compliance pipeline
Common objection:
"Sightengine has dedicated moderation models — Filtrate can't match that."
Sightengine's models are solid, but moderation is only one part of the compliance checklist. For marketplaces, classifieds, and listing sites, you also need EXIF stripped and WebP compression. Sightengine does none of that. You'd need to stitch together: Sightengine for moderation + a CDN for EXIF + a separate optimizer. That's three vendors and three integrations. Filtrate handles all three for $0.002/image.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Filtrate | Sightengine |
|---|---|---|
| Metadata strip (EXIF) | No | |
| Image optimization (WebP/AVIF) | No | |
| AI content moderation | Yes — multi-model classification | |
| Built-in storage/delivery | No — classification only | |
| Human review workflow | No — build yourself | |
| Developer-first API | Raw REST — limited SDK, documented integration issues | |
| No double-vendor risk | Must pair with CDN/storage separately | |
| Free sandbox | Free tier with limits |
Pricing comparison
Cost at volume — Filtrate vs Sightengine
| Volume | Filtrate | Sightengine |
|---|---|---|
| 10K images/mo | $20 10K × $0.002 | $69 Starter $29 + 20K overage × $0.002 (3 models = 30K ops) |
| 100K images/mo | $200 100K × $0.002 | $619 Pro $99 + 260K overage × $0.002 (3 models = 300K ops) |
| 1M images/mo | $2,000 1M × $0.002 | $6,019+ Pro $99 + ~2.96M overage × $0.002 (3 models = 3M ops) — Enterprise pricing likely applies |
* Source: sightengine.com/pricing · Retrieved 2026-06-05. Sightengine bills per operation; 3 moderation model groups (nudity, weapons, gore) = 3 ops/image. Overage rate $0.002/op on both Starter and Pro plans.
Integration effort
const result = await fetch('https://api.filtrate.polsia.app/v1/process', {
method: 'POST',
headers: { 'X-API-Key': 'flt_live_…' },
body: new FormData().append('image', file),
});
// Returns: moderated image (EXIF stripped, WebP optimized, verdict included)
// Sightengine: one model group per request
const r1 = await fetch('https://api.sightengine.com/1.0/check.json', {
method: 'POST',
body: new FormData([
['media', imageFile],
['models', 'nudity-2.1,weapon,gore-2.0'],
['api_user', '{api_user}'],
['api_secret', '{api_secret}'],
]),
});
// EXIF strip? NOT AVAILABLE — need a separate tool
// WebP optimize? NOT AVAILABLE — need another tool
When to pick Filtrate
- You need EXIF strip, optimization, and moderation in one call without three integrations
- You want transparent per-image pricing with no per-model billing surprises
- You need GDPR-safe media for a marketplace or e-commerce platform
- You want GPT-4o-mini moderation included, not as an add-on
- You need to get live today, not in a sprint
When Sightengine makes sense
- You only need classification-only moderation with no image transformation or storage needs
- You already have a separate CDN and metadata stripper and just want moderation
- You need a specific model that Sightengine has and Filtrate does not
One API. All three operations. No vendor lock-in.
Most tools do one thing well. Filtrate does everything compliance demands in a single call. No stitching together a CDN + moderation service + metadata stripper. One endpoint. One bill. One integration.
Try the API playground
Test against real images. See the verdict in 1–5 seconds. No account required.
Also compare: